MANN numbers of 82.8% and 94.9%

You say:

>I can't find the MANN numbers of 82.8% and 94.9% in their paper [21]; not clear where they come from. E.g. for 5 classes and 5-shot they seem to report 88.4% not 94.9% as seen here. I must be missing something.

MANN paper [21] says:
>The network exhibited high classification accuracy on just the second presentation of a sample from a class within an episode (82.8%), reaching up to 94.9% accuracy by the fifth instance

It is also in Table 1

Start by locating the paper note that contains Table 1 and inspect cited paper [21], focusing on the 82.8% and 94.9% claims and the 5-class, 5-shot comparison. Done means identifying the source of the discrepancy and updating or clarifying the note so its figures match the paper.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.