Why is the result not as good as faster-rcnn? Have you modified the code?
Open
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 969
- Forks
- 220
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
I have run this code, based on resnet101, the best epoch result is 70.1, which is much less compared to faster-rcnn ---74.X, I want to know why?Can you tell me?Thank you!
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start by reproducing the reported ResNet-101 run and compare its best epoch result of 70.1 with Faster R-CNN's 74.X result. Then inspect the code for modifications relevant to that comparison; done means identifying the cause of the performance gap or confirming the expected result.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python, pytorch
- Domain
- computer-vision, machine-learning
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100