the result in LFPW and Helen

first of all thank you for your code ! it works well !
but i notice that when i run it on LFPW, the err is much higher than the paper(5.17/3.35). but on Helen, the result is nearly the same . how do you think about this issue?
the second one i'm confusion is that for helen (194 landmakers), the paper use total 300 trees, averaged less than 2 for each maker. how it comes??? it seems like only decision tree instead random forest~~~~(>_<)~~~~

looking forward to your reply~~~
thanks again!

No files, tests, or entry points are named. Reproduce the LFPW and Helen runs, then compare the reported errors with the paper and verify how the 300 trees are allocated across 194 landmarks; done when both discrepancies are explained.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.