junegunn / junegunn/vader.vim

Wrong behavior of new command with vim v7.4

Open
#135 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
Vim Script
Stars
599
Forks
40
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Following vader test shows a wrong behavior with vim 7.4:

```
Execute (Test new):
call vader#log("1 bufname " . bufname("%"))
silent execute "new toto/"
call vader#log("2 bufname " . bufname("%"))
silent execute "buffer toto/"
call vader#log("3 bufname " . bufname("%"))
```

I get the following output:
```
Starting Vader: 1 suite(s), 1 case(s)
Starting Vader: /tmp/test.vader
(1/1) [EXECUTE] Test new
> 1 bufname [Vader-workbench]
> 2 bufname [Vader-workbench]
> 3 bufname toto/
Success/Total: 1/1
```

but I expect this one:
```
Starting Vader: 1 suite(s), 1 case(s)
Starting Vader: /tmp/test.vader
(1/1) [EXECUTE] Test new
> 1 bufname [Vader-workbench]
> 3 bufname toto/
> 3 bufname toto/
Success/Total: 1/1
```

Two things to note:
* the culprit is the buffer name, finishing with a `/` (it is indeed a valid buffer name)
* it works with neovim, did not try with vim 8.0

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.