joshsoftware / joshsoftware/computer_vision_pocs
Evaluate OCR Models and Finalize Best Fit
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
# Evaluate OCR Models and Finalize Best Fit (Refer: Wiki Report)
## Description
We have tested multiple OCR models to evaluate their accuracy, ease of use, and performance across English and Marathi text inputs.
The detailed results and observations are documented in the project wiki:
🔗 **[OCR Model Comparison Report](https://github.com/joshsoftware/computer_vision_pocs/wiki/OCR-Model-Report)**
---
## Summary of Findings
- **Tesseract**
Best overall performance. Accurate, lightweight, and easy to integrate.
- **EasyOCR**
Moderate performance; issues with structure and sentence clarity.
- **I2L-NOPOOL** & **DTrOCR**
Requires additional training or lacks proper documentation.
- **GPT-4o**
Requires GPT Plus subscription (not free).
---
## Additional Notes
- This issue is linked to the [OCR research wiki](https://github.com/joshsoftware/computer_vision_pocs/wiki/OCR-Model-Report) for ongoing reference.
- We may consider post-processing like word segmentation or spell correction in the future for further improvements.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.