jenkinsci / jenkinsci/lockable-resources-plugin

UX: better wording for queued filter

Open Beginner friendly
#1,073 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
Java
Stars
99
Forks
205
Avg merge
2d 13h
Merged PRs (30d)
8

Description

> Hello,
>
> The "Queued" option in the Resources tab filter filters resources that are requested by freestyle jobs waiting in the build queue, but the label doesn't make that clear.
> Pipeline lock() waits don't mark the resource, so on a pipeline-only controller this filter will always return zero results.
> Could the label be changed to indicate the freestyle case (for example, "Required by freestyle")?

_Originally posted by @kohtaro-satoh in [#1040](https://github.com/jenkinsci/lockable-resources-plugin/issues/1040#issuecomment-5098276828)_

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

No file or test is named. Start at the Resources tab's filter implementation and trace the "Queued" label. Done means the label clearly indicates that it applies to resources requested by queued freestyle jobs, while preserving the existing filter behavior.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
java
Domain
frontend
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
2/5
Estimated time
1-3 hours
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
68/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.