jd-opensource / jd-opensource/JoyAI-Echo

Verify evals on Papers with Code

Open
#21 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
Python
Stars
2k
Forks
168
Avg merge
2h 58m
Merged PRs (30d)
1

Description

Hi,

Niels here from the open-source team at Hugging Face. Congratulations on your work!

I've made the [paper](https://paperswithcode.co/paper/2608.23383) and [1 paper-native evaluation](https://paperswithcode.co/paper/2608.23383#results) available on Papers with Code.

The paper is part of the [World Models](https://paperswithcode.co/tasks/world-models) task page.

The EchoWM result currently ranks first on [WBench (Navigation Split)](https://paperswithcode.co/benchmark/wbench-navigation-split?task=world-models&eval=28524).

Would it be possible to verify these results and let me know if any score, model name, benchmark protocol, or openness metadata should be corrected? The imported rows are tied to the paper or its official release artifacts; comparison-table baselines were not added.

You can also edit the task, methods, project page, and GitHub URL directly from the paper page using your Hugging Face account.

If you'd like to showcase the results in your repository README, you can copy these live leaderboard badges (or use the “Copy PwC badge” button in the Results section):

[![Papers with Code: SOTA on WBench (Navigation Split)](https://paperswithcode.co/api/v1/papers/2608.23383/leaderboard-badge.svg?eval=28524&live=1)](https://paperswithcode.co/api/v1/papers/2608.23383/leaderboard-badge-link?eval=28524)

Kind regards,

Niels

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Research direction

Start with the linked paper's Results entry and the WBench Navigation Split leaderboard, then compare the score, model name, benchmark protocol, and openness metadata with the paper or official release artifacts. Done when discrepancies are identified and the Papers with Code record is confirmed or corrected.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
documentation
Issue type
Documentation
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
68/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.