jd-opensource / jd-opensource/JoyAI-Echo
Verify evals on Papers with Code
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 2k
- Forks
- 168
- Avg merge
- 2h 58m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
Hi,
Niels here from the open-source team at Hugging Face. Congratulations on your work!
I've made the [paper](https://paperswithcode.co/paper/2608.23383) and [1 paper-native evaluation](https://paperswithcode.co/paper/2608.23383#results) available on Papers with Code.
The paper is part of the [World Models](https://paperswithcode.co/tasks/world-models) task page.
The EchoWM result currently ranks first on [WBench (Navigation Split)](https://paperswithcode.co/benchmark/wbench-navigation-split?task=world-models&eval=28524).
Would it be possible to verify these results and let me know if any score, model name, benchmark protocol, or openness metadata should be corrected? The imported rows are tied to the paper or its official release artifacts; comparison-table baselines were not added.
You can also edit the task, methods, project page, and GitHub URL directly from the paper page using your Hugging Face account.
If you'd like to showcase the results in your repository README, you can copy these live leaderboard badges (or use the “Copy PwC badge” button in the Results section):
[](https://paperswithcode.co/api/v1/papers/2608.23383/leaderboard-badge-link?eval=28524)
Kind regards,
Niels
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start with the linked paper's Results entry and the WBench Navigation Split leaderboard, then compare the score, model name, benchmark protocol, and openness metadata with the paper or official release artifacts. Done when discrepancies are identified and the Papers with Code record is confirmed or corrected.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 68/100