jamesplease / jamesplease/router-comparison

Route + route name abstraction

Open
#31 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
No language data
Stars
38
Forks
0
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

In Ember, there are both. In newer routers, inspired by React Router, neither exist.

The route abstraction adds additional conceptual complexity, but comes with extra functionality, like multiple outlets per route. In the React world (and other routers), it might make it harder to place multiple components in that same way (see: https://github.com/reactjs/react-router/blob/master/examples/sidebar/app.js )

I should think more about this. These thoughts came up while I was working withs sheet-router, which is a pretty barebones implementation.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Research direction

Read the linked React Router sidebar example and the sheet-router implementation referenced in the issue. First clarify whether route and route-name abstractions are being proposed or rejected, then define a concrete scope and acceptance criteria before implementation; the issue currently provides no files, tests, or actionable completion condition.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
react
Domain
frontend
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
20/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.