jamesplease / jamesplease/router-comparison
Route + route name abstraction
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 38
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
In Ember, there are both. In newer routers, inspired by React Router, neither exist.
The route abstraction adds additional conceptual complexity, but comes with extra functionality, like multiple outlets per route. In the React world (and other routers), it might make it harder to place multiple components in that same way (see: https://github.com/reactjs/react-router/blob/master/examples/sidebar/app.js )
I should think more about this. These thoughts came up while I was working withs sheet-router, which is a pretty barebones implementation.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Read the linked React Router sidebar example and the sheet-router implementation referenced in the issue. First clarify whether route and route-name abstractions are being proposed or rejected, then define a concrete scope and acceptance criteria before implementation; the issue currently provides no files, tests, or actionable completion condition.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- react
- Domain
- frontend
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100