jakartaee / jakartaee/messaging
Clarify how the JMS provider should interact with Transaction Managers.
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 49
- Forks
- 34
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Clarify how the JMS provider should interact with Transaction Managers. In particular, the responsibilities of the JMS Provider, the TM and the App Server during recovery need to be clearly defined.
(This issue is a placeholder. More information about the ambiguities that need to be resolved will be added later)
#### Affected Versions
[1.1]
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start by reviewing the issue body and its unresolved comment discussion for the missing recovery details; no files or tests are identified. Clarify and document the responsibilities of the JMS provider, Transaction Manager, and application server for the affected JMS 1.1 behavior, with agreement on the resulting guidance as the completion criterion.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- java
- Domain
- backend, distributed-systems
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100