visibility SPI does not enable to implement default rules

The default implicit visibility spi equivalent has rules like "if there is a field and some getter/setter ....", this can only be implemented if you have the field + the clazz being mapped (example ClassWithField and SubClassWithGetterForField). Current SPI does not enable to implement that.
Idea of this ticket is to give a context enabling to implement such a rule passing the class being mapped too and if it is for serialization or deserialization (I guess we want a context `{field,class,type}`).
Similarly for methods we would need a context too.
Current methods can be implemented with a default in a ContextAwarePropertyVisibility new SPI to not break backward compatibility maybe?

Start by reviewing the existing visibility SPI and the proposed ContextAwarePropertyVisibility compatibility approach in issue #328. Define the context needed for fields and methods, including the mapped class and serialization or deserialization direction; done means default visibility rules can use that context without breaking existing implementations.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.