It should be possible to specify Resource Dependencies via XML
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 127
- Forks
- 59
- Avg merge
- 23h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 7
Description
From the portlet EG mailing list (Neil Griffin and Ed Burns)
NG> @Ed Burns: When you get a chance, could you please shed some light
NG> on why resource dependencies can only be done via JSF annotations,
NG> and not by faces-config.xml? Thx.
EB> I suppose it could be. It turned out to be easier to implement with
EB> annotations. I think you have discovered a wrinkle where our stated
EB> goal of having complete parity of functionality between annotations and
EB> XML is not met.
#### Affected Versions
[2.2]
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start by reviewing the existing JSF annotation-based resource dependency support and the faces-config.xml configuration model. Compare how dependencies are represented in each path, then determine the configuration and test entry points needed for equivalent XML support. Done means resource dependencies can be declared in faces-config.xml with parity to annotations.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- java
- Domain
- frontend
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100