jakartaee / jakartaee/faces

It should be possible to specify Resource Dependencies via XML

Open
#1,252 4 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Component: Resources Priority: Minor Type: Improvement
Dominant language
Java
Stars
127
Forks
59
Avg merge
23h
Merged PRs (30d)
7

Description

From the portlet EG mailing list (Neil Griffin and Ed Burns)

NG> @Ed Burns: When you get a chance, could you please shed some light
NG> on why resource dependencies can only be done via JSF annotations,
NG> and not by faces-config.xml? Thx.

EB> I suppose it could be. It turned out to be easier to implement with
EB> annotations. I think you have discovered a wrinkle where our stated
EB> goal of having complete parity of functionality between annotations and
EB> XML is not met.
#### Affected Versions
[2.2]

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

Start by reviewing the existing JSF annotation-based resource dependency support and the faces-config.xml configuration model. Compare how dependencies are represented in each path, then determine the configuration and test entry points needed for equivalent XML support. Done means resource dependencies can be declared in faces-config.xml with parity to annotations.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
java
Domain
frontend
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
30/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.