jakartaee / jakartaee/collateral
Design showing synergy between Jakarta EE and MicroProfile
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 4
- Forks
- 9
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Hello everybody,
I'm currently creating my blog talking about standards Jakarta EE / MicroProfile / etc.
I create a design in svg for my blog, I would like to know if I can submit it to Eclipse foundation.
You can see it [here](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/BaptisteMeynier/Infographie/master/preview.png)
If is it the case I have some questions to clean my work in order to be compliant with Eclipse foundation legal rules.
1) Global I'm looking for where I can download Jakarta EE and Microprofile fonts to replace the font that I used.
2) Section 2 I design myself a leaf, I did not realize but someone say me that It looks like Spring Logo. It could be confusing, is it a problem ?
3) Section 4 I get two elements from internet the plume and the container, should I redesign these elements ?.
4) Section 5 I put the Open source logo inside the word "YOU" I does not include the symbol copyright (r)
5) Section 5 same comment for brand IBM, Payara, Tomitribe, set copyright is it mandatory ?
6) Section 5 I put some companies which contribute to the project maybe I forget some companies, Should I put all companies contributing to the project? (It should be difficult to integrate all inside the design).
7) Section 6 Same question as before but about implementations.
6) Do you see any other issue ?
Contributor guide
Research direction
Review the linked preview.png and the questions about submitting the design to the Eclipse Foundation. Clarify the applicable branding, copyright, attribution, and contributor-list requirements with maintainers before making changes. Done means the submission path and required design revisions are agreed.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- content, design
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100