In kick, ban and tempmute logs the old name system is still in use
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 600
- Forks
- 338
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
In some log actions, e.g.:
- kick
- ban
- tempmute
- (possibly more)
... the old naming system of discord is still in use.
Example - first and third message is a kick and tempmute log, which still uses the old naming system (`ExampleUser#1234`). The second log message is a edit of a message, which uses already the current naming system (`ExampleUser`).
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the log generation for kick, ban, and tempmute actions, then compare their name formatting with the message-edit log shown in the issue. The work is done when these affected moderation logs use the current Discord naming system without the discriminator suffix, and any additional affected log actions are covered.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- java
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100