jackfrued / jackfrued/Python-100-Days

NullBooleanField官方已经要删除了,是不是不应该这么建议了?

Open
#702 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Jupyter Notebook
Stars
187k
Forks
55.8k
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

【补充内容】->【Django模型最佳实践】的第六条 如果布尔类型可以为空要使用NullBooleanField。
官方文档提示已准备在3.1之后删除了啊,附链接https://docs.djangoproject.com/zh-hans/3.1/ref/models/fields/#nullbooleanfield

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Open Day41-55/42.深入模型.md at the Django模型最佳实践 section and review its sixth recommendation about NullBooleanField. Check the linked Django 3.1 documentation, update the recommendation to reflect the deprecation, and verify that the surrounding guidance remains accurate.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
django, python
Domain
documentation
Issue type
Documentation
Difficulty
1/5
Estimated time
Under an hour
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Clearly specified
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.