jackfirth / jackfirth/resyntax
tidy-requires: module paths w/in require subforms should sort
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
bug
existing lint
- Dominant language
- Racket
- Stars
- 70
- Forks
- 11
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
This suggestion conflicts with this racket-review rule which ensures that uses of require subforms sort according to their module path. Another example can be found here.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by comparing the linked racket-review rule in lint.rkt with the conflicting tidy-requires suggestion and the racket-sentry and racket-http-easy examples. Trace the existing require-subform sorting behavior in resyntax, then verify that module paths within require subforms sort consistently with the rule.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100