Parallelism
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Stale
- Domain
- performance, tooling
Research direction
No files or tests are named. Start by tracing how resyntax macroexpands and analyzes independent modules, then investigate how worker places could schedule that work safely. Done means large-codebase analysis runs in parallel while preserving the existing analysis results.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Running resyntax on large codebases is slow, since it needs to macroexpand everything. But analysis of different modules is independent so it should be easy to parallelize the work using worker places.
- Dominant language
- Racket
- Stars
- 70
- Forks
- 11
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from jackfirth/resyntax
-
documentation
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
documentation
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
-
testing
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
-
testing
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
testing
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 68/100
All issues in jackfirth/resyntax
Similar issues
-
area/sessions comp/agent P2 tool/skills type/perf
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
NousResearch/hermes-agent#117788 ·
-
type/automation type/performance
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
BasedHardware/omi#15290 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
open-goal/jak-project#4424 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 88/100
beyond-all-reason/RecoilEngine#3390 · 1 comment ·