Future project maintenance
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 546
- Forks
- 83
- Avg merge
- 2d 21h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
I'm not currently using this project nor have I been closely following the advancements in the replication protocol. While I still have been reviewing and merging PRs my ability to adequately judge PRs has diminished. The best I can do is review for obvious errors. This is leading to holdups on PRs that probably should be merged like #68 as I don't have the sufficient context to know if the design is good.
I'd like to either add more maintainers to this project or coordinate a friendly fork or handoff.
If anyone has any suggestions or wants to volunteer, please reply here.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start by reviewing this issue and the context of issue #68, then read the project's PostgreSQL logical replication responsibilities before proposing a maintainer addition, fork, or handoff. Done means the project has an agreed ownership or maintenance path; the issue names no specific files or tests to run.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- go, postgresql
- Domain
- databases, distributed-systems
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100