ityonemo / ityonemo/mavis

should one generally put `optional(any) => any` into maps?

Open
#4 2 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
deviations from erlang/elixir
Dominant language
Elixir
Stars
110
Forks
4
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

I think the answer this should be explicit, because something like a struct should not generally have optional(any) => any.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Research direction

No files, tests, or entry points are named. Start by locating the map and struct handling in the Elixir library, then review the existing treatment of optional(any) => any and determine what explicit behavior and tests would be needed.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
elixir
Domain
tooling
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
20/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.