Clarification on the scope of rule C.83

The company I work for employs a third party static code quality checker. This tool has recently adopted a number of additional checks. One of them is rule C.83. The tool very literally implements the mentioned enforcement "A class without virtual functions should have a swap member function declared."

The consequence of this is that any Plain Old Datatype and non-polymorphic class is flagged if it misses the swap method.
The solution advised is to add

class C
{
   ...
   void swap(C &other) noexcept { std::swap(*this, other); } 
   ...
};

in such cases.

I wonder if this was the intention of the rule and if perhaps some context is missing as to when to apply this rule.

Start with the C.83 section in CppCoreGuidelines.md and compare its stated enforcement with the examples and wording referenced in the issue. Clarify whether the rule applies to all non-polymorphic classes or needs additional context; done means the guideline's scope is explicit enough to resolve the static-checker interpretation.