isocpp / isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines
C.hier: discussion on alternative implementations of run-time polimorphism is missing.
Open
@hsutter is already working on this.
Since Jul 9, 2018.
- Dominant language
- CSS
- Stars
- 45.3k
- Forks
- 5.6k
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
There is a long section on the rules of implementing run-time polimorphism via class hierarchies, but no guidelines on the alternative implementations on runtime-polimorphism, (I.e., with std::variant, or type erased containers).
I think some guidance on when to use which sollution would also be great. (I am addicted to variants these days, so I cannot really come up with those ...)
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.