Use Supplier<Text> instead of Text for option names

Currently all options are passed a fixed Text for their name. Sometimes, especially in the case of buttons, it would be nice to change their text. I propose updating the option implementations and builders to use a Supplier<Text> instead. This change would also easily be backwards compatible.

To demonstrate take this simple example:

This is currently possible:

AtomicBoolean added = new AtomicBoolean(false);
ButtonOption.createBuilder()
    .name(Text.literal("Add or Remove"))
    .action((scr, opt) -> {
        if(added.get()) {
            added.set(false);
        } else {
            added.set(true);
        }
    });

This would be possible with the proposal:

AtomicBoolean added = new AtomicBoolean(false);
ButtonOption.createBuilder()
    .name(() => added.get() ? Text.literal("Remove") : Text.literal("Add"))
    .action((scr, opt) -> {
        if(added.get()) {
            added.set(false);
        } else {
            added.set(true);
        }
    });

Start by locating the option implementations and their builders that currently accept a fixed Text name, then compare them with the ButtonOption examples in the issue. Update the option naming path so the proposed Supplier form works while the existing Text form remains compatible, and verify that dynamically changing names are reflected after the action runs.