Permanence Objective - Not explained
Open
need/maintainers-input
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 332
- Forks
- 499
- Avg merge
- 8d 14h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
The central idea of giving content "permanence", is mentioned, but then very weakly "explained away" with "pinning".
The pinning concept though, has not a line about how to preserve content without paying for resources.
It seems to be a fundamental flaw in the fight against censorship and loss of "heritage" that "pinning" does not technically include anonymous pinning, in form of "co-pinning" for example.
cs.ipfs.tech/concepts/persistence/#persistence-versus-permanence
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.