internetarchive / internetarchive/openlibrary
Generalize Trusted Book Provider so anyone can propose a TBP via a PR
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 6.7k
- Forks
- 2k
- Avg merge
- 2d 19h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 138
Description
### Problem
### A clear and concise description of what you want to happen
Similar to #9234, refactor the Trusted Book Provider flow so that:
* A new trusted book provider is added by opening a PR request with a yml entry for the new provider
* Minimize coding requirements for submitter: e.g. No new button template file or python class is required
* On app start, TBP's are loaded from the yml and registered with Open Library
### Additional Context
The goal is to unblock some of these [github issues](https://github.com/internetarchive/openlibrary/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22Theme%3A+Trusted+Book+Providers%22) that propose new providers and also this [google form](https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1iqz8o7CUlkTO0nUVtu6zcUQ_aTBJRBfU46cxnMO_2A8/edit?pli=1&pli=1#responses)
### Proposal & Constraints
### What is the proposed solution / implementation?
### Is there a precedent of this approach succeeding elsewhere?
### Which suggestions or requirements should be considered for how feature needs to appear or be implemented?
### Leads
### Related files
### Stakeholders
**Note:** Before [making a new branch](https://github.com/internetarchive/openlibrary/wiki/Git-Cheat-Sheet#making-changes-and-creating-a-pull-request) _or_ updating an existing one, please [ensure your branch is up to date](https://github.com/internetarchive/openlibrary/wiki/Git-Cheat-Sheet#working-on-your-branch).
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.