question about the chosen ACPI representation
Open
- Dominant language
- C
- Stars
- 251
- Forks
- 75
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
I see that https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu-bridge.c is a thing, which is certainly nice, but what is the reason that _DSD with these properties couldn't have been used to begin with? I doubt Windows cares either way, so might as well use a more reasonable representation? Notably, these properties are effectively standardized for OF platforms.
Specifically, I think https://docs.kernel.org/6.0/firmware-guide/acpi/dsd/graph.html gives a good overview of how this would work.
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.