intel / intel/dml-language-server
Implement semantics for provisionals
Open
enhancement
Medium Priority
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 9
- Forks
- 9
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Group issue for provisional semantic implementation
In general:
- We always need to support new syntax for provisionals
- We should probably warn/error if the new syntax is used without the provisional declaration
- We do not need to speculatively enforce restrictions imposed by provisionals I don't think, this can probably wait until they are stablized
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.