Is my SGX quote verification really working ?

Hi,
I am executing the SampleCode/QuoteVerificationSample code to verify a quote on an Azure VM (Standard DC2s_v2).
The thing is, the provided code is not working (compilation errors) as it is and needs some slight modifications:

- Comment the line `#include "sgx_default_quote_provider.h"` (because it does not recognize the file),
- Replace success codes such as `TEE_SUCCESS` by `SGX_SUCCESS` (as suggested by the compiler),
- Replace verification result codes such as `TEE_XX` by `SGX_QL_XX` (XX being any verification result).

After the former modification and the execution of `./app -quote quote.dat`, I have the following result:

```
[APP] Info: ECDSA quote path: quote.dat
[APP] Trusted quote verification:
[APP] Info: get target info successfully returned.
[APP] Info: sgx_qv_set_enclave_load_policy successfully returned.
[APP] Info: tee_get_quote_supplemental_data_version_and_size successfully returned.
[APP] Info: latest supplemental data major version: 3, minor version: 3, size: 536
Azure Quote Provider: libdcap_quoteprov.so [ERROR]: Could not retrieve environment variable for 'AZDCAP_DEBUG_LOG_LEVEL'
[APP] Info: App: tee_verify_quote successfully returned.
[APP] Info: Ecall: Verify QvE report and identity successfully returned.
[APP] Warning: App: Verification completed with Non-terminal result: a007
[APP] Info: Supplemental data Major Version: 3
[APP] Info: Supplemental data Minor Version: 3

===========================================

[APP] Untrusted quote verification:
[APP] Info: tee_get_quote_supplemental_data_version_and_size successfully returned.
[APP] Info: latest supplemental data major version: 3, minor version: 3, size: 536
[APP] Info: App: tee_verify_quote successfully returned.
[APP] Warning: App: Verification completed with Non-terminal result: a007
[APP] Info: Supplemental data Major Version: 3
[APP] Info: Supplemental data Minor Version: 3
```
I do not know how to interpret these results. The `tee_verify_quote successfully returned` suggests me that the verification works correctly. However, the amount of undocumented modifications I have introduced in the code as well as the non-terminal returned result (a007) give me doubts.

Can you help me to clarify the situation ?

Thank you