intel / intel/confidential-computing.tee.dcap

SGX attestation is unnecessarily complex

Open
#440 1 comment 1 reaction 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
C
Stars
326
Forks
198
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

I’m not sure if this is a constructive issue, but it seems that the attestation process is overly complex. In particular, the PCE attests a QE, which then attests the third-party enclave. It would be much simpler for the PCE to attest the third-party enclave directly. This would also avoid quote verification having to check that the quoting enclave identity is correct.

I imagine it is too late to change this, but I am curious what the reason behind this design decision was. The only documentation I can find is that the public part of the PCK might be considered confidential, but that only applies to legacy EPID-based attestation (which is approaching EOL).

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.