intel / intel/confidential-computing.tee.dcap
SGX attestation is unnecessarily complex
- Dominant language
- C
- Stars
- 326
- Forks
- 198
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
I’m not sure if this is a constructive issue, but it seems that the attestation process is overly complex. In particular, the PCE attests a QE, which then attests the third-party enclave. It would be much simpler for the PCE to attest the third-party enclave directly. This would also avoid quote verification having to check that the quoting enclave identity is correct.
I imagine it is too late to change this, but I am curious what the reason behind this design decision was. The only documentation I can find is that the public part of the PCK might be considered confidential, but that only applies to legacy EPID-based attestation (which is approaching EOL).
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.