insightsengineering / insightsengineering/teal
[Question]: Should decorators be also tested at the modules packages level?
- Dominant language
- R
- Stars
- 263
- Forks
- 59
- Avg merge
- 5d 17h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Description
### What is your question?
Currently there are 3 tests in `teal` and 2 shinytest2 tests in `teal` that cover decorators. Even though the main functionality is implemented in `teal`, actual usage and some customization is provided at modules packages. Should we extend modules packages tests (like in tmg/tmc) to cover decorators usage? Those module packages have some custom functions for decorators specification that do not exist in `teal`, hence the reason to test them there.
Some examples to be used for tmg:
- https://github.com/insightsengineering/teal.modules.general/pull/826/#issuecomment-2598165483
- https://github.com/insightsengineering/teal.modules.general/pull/826/#discussion_r1920380270
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.