input-output-hk / input-output-hk/Interoperability-working-group
Token minting and capabilities
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 7
- Forks
- 5
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Slightly related to Issue #12. There seems to be missing materials on actual capabilities in regards of interoperability and token minting approaches, especially in comparison with ERC-20 tokens:
* native scripts
* native scripts with mpcs
* plutus minting policies
* just locking tokens
As part of this issue, what would be the ideal capabilites that would be required by bridges?
From `eL | DcentraLab` from discord
1. ability to freeze mints.
2. ability to freeze the tokens themselves.
3. ability to freeze the path of the bridge
Basically, having programmable tokens. Could this be handled by CIPs and extending token policies?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.