imls-dmt / imls-dmt/userinterface
Clarify meaning of Access Cost responses
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
View - Metadata
View - Submission/Metadata
- Dominant language
- Vue
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 1
- Avg merge
- 1h 57m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 9
Description
Suggestion from ESIP Summer 2022 workshop feedback. Yes/No considered too confusing.
Suggestions: Change Access Cost options to Fee/No fee instead of Yes/No
or change heading to make access cost a question, so that ‘yes’ or ‘no’ make more sense as responses
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Inspect the Access Cost interface and find where its Yes/No responses and heading are defined. Choose between the suggested Fee/No fee labels or a clearer question heading, then verify that the displayed responses make sense to users.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- frontend
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100