Reconcile and clean up watershed ops
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 94
- Forks
- 44
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
ImgLib2 Algorithm has its own [Watershed](https://github.com/imglib/imglib2-algorithm/blob/imglib2-algorithm-0.10.0/src/main/java/net/imglib2/algorithm/labeling/Watershed.java#L55-L73), separate from what's implemented in `net.imagej.ops.image.watershed`.
We need to:
1. Reconcile our implementations.
2. Move the watershed ops to `segment.watershed`.
3. Validate that they really work correctly.
4. Add an op that behaves like ImageJ1's (binary) Watershed command.
5. Add missing unit tests.
See also:
* https://gitter.im/imglib/imglib2?at=5bc49aadf659e67772bd5580
* imglib/imglib2-algorithm#48, imglib/imglib2-algorithm#61, imglib/imglib2-algorithm#66
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start by comparing ImgLib2 Algorithm's Watershed.java with the implementation under net.imagej.ops.image.watershed, then review the requested segment.watershed relocation. Validate the watershed behavior, add the ImageJ1-compatible binary Watershed op, and define missing unit tests that cover the reconciled implementations.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- java
- Domain
- computer-vision
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100