Additional dynamic and soft constraints for `total_capacity`
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
enh
gams
help wanted
- Dominant language
- Jupyter Notebook
- Stars
- 150
- Forks
- 178
- Avg merge
- 17h 32m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
Currently, dynamic constraints `growth_*_lo/up` and `initial_*_lo/up` as well as corresponding soft constraints can only be assigned for `activity` and `new_capacity` for technologies. A similar formulation is also required for `total_capacity`.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are named. Start by locating the existing dynamic and soft constraint handling for technology activity and new_capacity, then compare how total_capacity is represented; done when equivalent growth and initial lower/upper constraints are supported and covered by the relevant tests.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100