idank / idank/explainshell

Doesn't support contextual flags with multiple definitions (i.e. `pacman -Rc`)

Open
#365 2 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Python
Stars
14.2k
Forks
851
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

the -c flag for pacman has differing definitions based on the letter that comes before, but this tool only shows the first explanation (which applies to pacman -Qc) rather than the contextually correct one.

Observed behavior: pacman -Rc describes -c using the definition for --changelog, which only applies as an option for -Q.

Expected behavior: pacman -Rc describes -c using the definition for --cascade, which applies to -R.

https://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/resolute/man8/pacman.8.html

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reproducing the reported pacman -Rc behavior and compare it with pacman -Qc, using the linked pacman man page to verify the contextual definitions. Trace how explainshell matches short flags to help text. Done means -c resolves to --cascade with -R and to --changelog with -Q.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
cli
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
65/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.