hypothesis / hypothesis/report
Address feedback about the overview board
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 1
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
We have had the following feedback about the board:
### About CAGR
* The CAGR numbers were expected to be a comparison from the numbers in one month to the same month from a year before
* I believe the CAGR / CMGR calculations are correct, but they are not what was expected
* We can also deliver a "this month last year" report and see which we like the best
* More descriptions on reports might help with this
> I've added a this month last year comparison and added more descriptions on reports explaining them. I think we might want to revisit the CAGR / CMGR calculation as it's based on whole years, so I suspect it will go massively negative in January. Should this be based on a trailing two year period?
### Annotating users in H looks too small compared with active LMS users (solved?)
* The number of "active" LMS users this month, and the number of "annotating" H users looks out of whack
* We do count activity in LMS and annotating in H differently - This could be correct?
* We could be counting different months?
* It could just be very bugged?
> So far this just looks correct - You can't directly compare annotating H users with and active LMS users
### Incorrect last month (solved?)
* The "last whole active month" doesn't look quite right. It should have changed to November here but doesn't seem to have
* Could this be the cause of some of the discrepancies above?
> Our date ranges weren't quite correct. I've set these to both the "last two months", but I have a feeling Metabase might mess this up throughout the month. We'll need to keep an eye and see what happens.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.