hyperfiddle / hyperfiddle/rcf

idea: unify with predicate

Open
#59 2 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Clojure
Stars
301
Forks
14
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

(tests
  (def h (clojure.java.io/file "src/"))
  (type h) := java.io.File
  (datafy h)
  := #:user.datafy-fs{:name "src",
                      :lastModifiedTime _,
                      :size _,
                      :isDirectory ::folder,
                      :children ~seq?})                ; here

as well as {:children [~(instance? java.io.File %) & _]}

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with the tests example and compare the ~seq? form for :children with the [(instance? java.io.File %) & _] form. Determine the intended unified predicate syntax and verify that both datafy assertions are supported consistently. Done means the requested predicate forms work in the shown Clojure example.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
clojure
Domain
testing
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.