hyperfiddle / hyperfiddle/rcf

better failed test report for RHS

Open
#36 0 comments 2 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Clojure
Stars
301
Forks
14
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

in (count-increased test1)

7
:<>
(+ 5 1)

I'd rather see the whole test on the first line and the resulting values in the comparison at the bottom. If I compare to a computation that don't know its value by heart I'll have to go and chase that value down. In this silly example I know the value of (+ 5 1) but in a more complicated scenario that won't be the case

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reproducing the count-increased test1 example and inspect the RCF failure-reporting entry point used for this test. The change is complete when the first line shows the whole test and the comparison displays the resulting values, including computed right-hand-side values such as (+ 5 1).

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
clojure
Domain
testing
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
45/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.