huggingface / huggingface/alignment-handbook
SFT lora ends with higher loss
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 5.7k
- Forks
- 490
- Avg merge
- 2m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
I've run the training without changing any hyperparameter except for batch size and gradient accumulation steps to match the global batch size on two machines.
The first run is exactly as in repo, gets eval loss 1.0667:
https://wandb.ai/evgeniizh/huggingface/runs/pskgg48d
The second one adds warmup (https://github.com/huggingface/alignment-handbook/pull/31 https://github.com/huggingface/alignment-handbook/pull/71) and uses TRL from master (which fixes https://github.com/huggingface/alignment-handbook/issues/61) and gets eval loss of 1.0927
https://wandb.ai/evgeniizh/huggingface/runs/9ez7kl7s
The official SFT model gets much lower loss of 0.99
https://huggingface.co/alignment-handbook/zephyr-7b-sft-lora
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.