huggingface / huggingface/alignment-handbook
Zephyr-dpo-full Checkpoints perform poorly on TruthfulQA.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 5.7k
- Forks
- 490
- Avg merge
- 2m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
Hello,
I observe that the models I trained and the official models provided by [HuggingFace](https://huggingface.co/alignment-handbook/) do not match the results of [Zephyr-7b-beta](https://huggingface.co/HuggingFaceH4/zephyr-7b-beta) on TruthfulQA.
I used lm_evaluate_harness for evaluation, and the metric used was mc2.
The result for HuggingFaceH4/zephyr-7b-beta is 55.15, and the result for mistralai/Mistral-7B-7b-beta is 42.59. Both of these numbers are correct.
However, the result for alignment-handbook/zephyr-7b-dpo-full is only 45.07, and the results for alignment-handbook/zephyr-7b-sft-full is only 40.38.
Furthermore, the results from my own trained checkpoint are also incorrect. The result for sft-full is 40.12, and the result for dpo-full is 47.40.
Version of lm-evaluate-harness is [this](https://github.com/EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness/commit/994bdb3fd3780110e45f479f5f409cae05e089bd)
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.