hiero-ledger / hiero-ledger/hiero-consensus-node
CLPR-12: Security Hardening
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 407
- Forks
- 226
- Avg merge
- 3d 4h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 210
Description
## Epic CLPR-12: Security Hardening
**Parent:** hiero-ledger/roadmap#48
**Repo:** hiero-ledger/hiero-consensus-node + Ethereum contracts repo
### Objective
Prepare CLPR for mainnet through security audit, penetration testing, and hardening.
### Expected Functionality
1. **Threat model** — Proof forgery, replay, response ordering manipulation, Connector fund theft, queue exhaustion, endpoint impersonation, verifier compromise, reentrancy, MEV attacks.
2. **External audit** — Hiero handlers, Ethereum contracts, verifier contracts, endpoint modules.
3. **Audit remediation** — All critical/high fixed. Medium triaged.
4. **Formal verification** — Running hash chain integrity, response ordering, connection state machine, slashing arithmetic.
5. **Penetration testing** — Adversarial testing on testnet: malicious endpoints, fabricated proofs, race conditions, fund extraction.
6. **Hardening** — Rate limiting, circuit breakers, emergency pause, monitoring alerts.
### Dependencies
- CLPR-1 through CLPR-10 (feature complete and integration tested)
### Risk
**High** — May uncover design-level issues requiring protocol changes.
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start by reviewing CLPR-1 through CLPR-10 and the CLPR-12 roadmap entry at hiero-ledger/roadmap#48, then map the listed threats across hiero-consensus-node and the Ethereum contracts repo. Define the audit, formal-verification, penetration-testing, and hardening work, with all critical/high findings fixed and medium findings triaged.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- java
- Domain
- blockchain, distributed-systems, security
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 15/100