haskell-distributed / haskell-distributed/distributed-process

Why are there no `xConcurrently` functions written?

Open
#384 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

distributed-process-async
Dominant language
Haskell
Stars
751
Forks
99
Avg merge
45m
Merged PRs (30d)
2

Description

In the Convenient Utilities section in Control.Concurrent.Async module of async package, there are many, well, convenient utilities exposed for running lists of IO actions concurrently. Is there a reason that these convenient utilities are not written in this library?

I understand that it would take a bit of effort to write them, but I was wondering if there is a deeper reason, one tightly coupled with the implementation of the Process monad, that these utilities do not exist.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reviewing the Process monad implementation and the Convenient Utilities section of Control.Concurrent.Async in the async package. Determine whether xConcurrently-style utilities fit this library's design and identify the API and behavior they would require. Done means either a documented design and implementation plan or a clear explanation of why these utilities should not be added.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
haskell
Domain
distributed-systems
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.