hashicorp / hashicorp/terraform-docs-common

AzureRM example is to have multiple tenants or multiple subscriptions?

Open
#744 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Makefile
Stars
36
Forks
133
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Is this example meant to show that you can use target multiple tenants or subscription? the AzureRM make a change to the tenant ID which mean the subscription ID is the same in two separate tenants and dynamic credentials allows or can be configured to target two tenants by using the AzureRM block.

It would be great if more details can be added to your documentation and sample terraform code using the two AzureRM block deploying resources to two separate subscriptions can be provided.

https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-docs-common/blob/main/website/docs/cloud-docs/workspaces/dynamic-provider-credentials/vault-backed/azure-configuration.mdx#azurerm-provider

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with the AzureRM provider section in website/docs/cloud-docs/workspaces/dynamic-provider-credentials/vault-backed/azure-configuration.mdx and review the linked example's tenant and subscription settings. Clarify whether it targets multiple tenants or subscriptions, then add the requested Terraform example using two AzureRM blocks and document the expected configuration.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
azure, terraform
Domain
cloud, documentation
Issue type
Documentation
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
45/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.