happyfish100 / happyfish100/FastCFS
FastCFS fuse 用于 kvm 的块存储性能怎么样
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- C
- Stars
- 605
- Forks
- 91
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
我维护了一套虚拟化系统. ceph 作为后端的块存储系统. 很长时间以来一直苦于IO性能的问题. 如果 FastCFS 可以通过 Fuse 挂载到本地. 那么我用这个挂载点存放块文件. 性能会如何? 数据强一致性可以保证吗. 如果FastCFS 可以作为数据库的存储来用. 那么也许作为kvm的后端性能上也是足够的. 好像 qemu-kvm + GlusterFS 也是这么玩的.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the issue's questions about mounting FastCFS through FUSE for KVM block files, storage performance, consistency, and database use. The issue names no files, tests, or entry points and does not define an implementation or measurable completion condition, so the scope would need clarification before work can begin.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- distributed-systems
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 15/100