hackforla / hackforla/lucky-parking
Define accessibility testing and quality-gate strategy
- Dominant language
- Jupyter Notebook
- Stars
- 37
- Forks
- 60
- Avg merge
- 13h 32m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Description
### Description
Define a pragmatic accessibility-testing approach for the web application, with automated checks supporting—not replacing—manual accessibility review.
### Action Items
- [ ] Refine scope around priority user journeys and applicable accessibility standard/target.
- [ ] Evaluate automated options, including axe integration with the future Playwright suite, linting, and CI reporting.
- [ ] Define manual testing expectations for keyboard navigation, focus management, semantics, screen-reader coverage, and color contrast.
- [ ] Identify false-positive management, ownership, and criteria for introducing required checks.
- [ ] Propose a phased rollout and a small initial baseline after the E2E strategy is approved.
### Additional Information
Status: Triage — refine standards, priority flows, tool choice, and ownership before implementation. Coordinate with #751 (E2E testing).
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start by reading issue #751 on the E2E strategy and reviewing the priority user journeys. Evaluate the proposed axe integration with the future Playwright suite, linting, CI reporting, and manual checks. Done means a phased accessibility-testing plan covering standards, ownership, false positives, required checks, and an initial baseline.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- playwright
- Domain
- accessibility, ci-cd, testing, web-dev
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100