hackforla / hackforla/lucky-parking

Define accessibility testing and quality-gate strategy

Open
#752 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
Jupyter Notebook
Stars
37
Forks
60
Avg merge
13h 32m
Merged PRs (30d)
5

Description

### Description

Define a pragmatic accessibility-testing approach for the web application, with automated checks supporting—not replacing—manual accessibility review.

### Action Items

- [ ] Refine scope around priority user journeys and applicable accessibility standard/target.
- [ ] Evaluate automated options, including axe integration with the future Playwright suite, linting, and CI reporting.
- [ ] Define manual testing expectations for keyboard navigation, focus management, semantics, screen-reader coverage, and color contrast.
- [ ] Identify false-positive management, ownership, and criteria for introducing required checks.
- [ ] Propose a phased rollout and a small initial baseline after the E2E strategy is approved.

### Additional Information

Status: Triage — refine standards, priority flows, tool choice, and ownership before implementation. Coordinate with #751 (E2E testing).

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

Start by reading issue #751 on the E2E strategy and reviewing the priority user journeys. Evaluate the proposed axe integration with the future Playwright suite, linting, CI reporting, and manual checks. Done means a phased accessibility-testing plan covering standards, ownership, false positives, required checks, and an initial baseline.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
playwright
Domain
accessibility, ci-cd, testing, web-dev
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
30/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.