hackforla / hackforla/lucky-parking
Evaluate and select a unit-test runner
- Dominant language
- Jupyter Notebook
- Stars
- 37
- Forks
- 60
- Avg merge
- 13h 32m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Description
### Description
Compare suitable unit-test runners, including Vitest, against the repository stack, developer workflow, and CI requirements; document the recommendation.
### Action Items
- [ ] Define evaluation criteria for a unit-test runner.
- [ ] Compare Vitest with viable alternatives.
- [ ] Prototype or validate the leading option if needed.
- [ ] Record the selected runner and rationale.
### Additional Information
Parent Epic: https://github.com/hackforla/lucky-parking/issues/732
Contributor guide
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are named. Start by reviewing the repository stack, developer workflow, and CI requirements, then compare Vitest with viable alternatives and prototype the leading option if needed; done means documenting the selected runner and rationale.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- testing, tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100