Standardise upon a templating system for transcripts
Open
codebase
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 19
- Forks
- 49
- Avg merge
- 2d 21h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 6
Description
Currently some transcripts use placeholders like `(user)` and use `.replace("(user)", user)`, whereas others use square brackets and `str#format()`, and I'm not sure why.
Let's try to move to one way to embed templates in strings - either one of the options above, or something like Jinja that'd let us make transcripts even more flexible.
Contributor guide
Research direction
The issue names no files, tests, or entry points. Start by inventorying transcript uses of `(user)`, square-bracket placeholders, `.replace()`, and `str#format()`; done means selecting one templating approach and making transcript formatting consistent.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100