Difference between RCOS output on Nugget vs original PsyQ

### Describe the bug

The **rcos** in the Nugget implementation outputs different values than the _rcos_ function in the original PsyQ 32-bit. I am including in this submission:

- A CSV file with the values of angles comparing the different output of RCOS from Nugget and PsyQ [rcos.csv](https://github.com/grumpycoders/pcsx-redux/files/14317931/rcos.csv)
- A .zip file with the binaries generated by both the Nugget build and the binary generated with the 32-bit PsyQ [binaries.zip](https://github.com/grumpycoders/pcsx-redux/files/14317934/binaries.zip)

Both binaries were generated using the same code. They contain a simple for-loop iterating angles from -8192 to 8192 outputting their **rcos**.

```
for (a = -8192; a <= 8192; a++) {
printf("rcos(%d) = %d", a, rcos(a));
}
```

### Expected behavior

I would expect the output of both functions to output be the same values given the same input.

### Steps to reproduce the bug

Compile and build two projects. One using Nugget with a modern toolchain and one using Windows XP 32-bit original PsyQ.

They run the same code:
```
for (a = -8192; a <= 8192; a++) {
printf("rcos(%d) = %d", a, rcos(a));
}
```

### Operating System

Windows 11

### PCSX-Redux version

This is not emulator-specific.

### CPU model

Intel Core i5 8th Gen

### GPU model & Drivers

Integrated/On-Board Graphics

### BIOS version

OpenBIOS

### Options

- [ ] Dynarec CPU
- [ ] 8MB
- [ ] OpenGL GPU
- [ ] Fastboot
- [ ] Debugger

### Iso checks

_No response_

### Logs

_No response_

### Additional information

Hopefully, with both binaries provided, it will be possible to disassemble and see the cosine table offsets and check what is going on.