Proposal: Remove mutable / immutable handler registry distinction
Open
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 12.1k
- Forks
- 4k
- Avg merge
- 2d 17h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 37
Description
I'd like to float the idea of removing the mutable / immutable service registry distinction on `io.grpc.Server`, as I feel it is an unnecessary distinction. As far as I can tell, the sole purpose was a performance concern, but this shouldn't have bearing on the API surface. The methods to get it are Experimental, and only seem to be used for reflection. I believe reflection can still be efficient without knowing the difference.
This is not the same as the "fallback" registry, which is stable API, and IMO is a better distinction than mutable / immutable.
Thoughts @ejona86 ?
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.