Alternative representation of SDL for better model consumption
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 25
- Forks
- 40
- Avg merge
- 18h 5m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 11
Description
There are suggestions for a more friendly relationship representation for LLM to conduct graph traversal.
- assignee(s): @PascalSenn @Keweiqu @abocan-atl
- source:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tJqUC9UI4EzY7U0sSqfsOuUDF6Q8LBcsSBwbgsE33sM/edit?tab=t.0
Note: Action Item issues are reviewed and closed during Working Group
meetings.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the linked meeting notes, which are the only source provided for the proposed SDL relationship representation. Clarify the intended representation and its graph-traversal goals for LLM consumption; done would require an agreed proposal, since no files, tests, or concrete implementation target are identified.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- ai, backend-api-design
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100