graphprotocol / graphprotocol/subgraph-dips-indexer-selection

feat: structured selection audit log

Open
#92 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Python
Stars
0
Forks
1
Avg merge
8d 17h
Merged PRs (30d)
1

Description

Motivation

Selection decisions are logged across ~15 separate lines, correlated only by deployment_id and lost on log rotation. No single record captures why an indexer was picked.

Proposal

Per-line logging exists (#103) but is scattered; the consolidated record is the open work. Struck items are already logged today.

One structured JSON record per /select-indexers call with:

  • Request params: deployment_id, chain_id, num_candidates, budget — existing/blocked still counts only, not identities
  • Full candidate list: weighted score, sync status, pool — today only top-5 scores + pool counts
  • Rejected + why (denylist, pending, declined, decentralisation) — today only aggregate counts
  • Each pick: pool, indexer, score, decentralisation met / fallback
  • Final group

Goal: reconstruct any selection from one record (stdout or shared volume), not scattered lines.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start at the /select-indexers entry point and trace the existing selection logging, including the current top-five scores, pool counts, and aggregate rejection counts. Done means one structured JSON record per call contains the full candidate and rejection details needed to reconstruct the selection, written to stdout or the shared volume.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
api, backend, observability
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
52/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.