Query Fees Collected - does not match estimation

Hi,

What

The total amount of queryFeesCollected for closed long term allocation does not match estimation (manual calculation):

Investigation:

Closed Allocation (open: 65, close: 91, duration: 27) as per query below collected 0.05 GRT, which is dramatically low in comparison with allocations before and after.

Query:

{
  indexer (id:"0x720a98087160bfdb282f695abe6f9ac966b03d43") {
    id
    totalAllocations{
      id
      status
      createdAtEpoch
      closedAtEpoch
      indexingRewards
      poi
      queryFeesCollected
      queryFeeRebates
    }
  }}

As per summary from server logs for mentioned period, the total amount of queries received and fees collected, should be:

QmRhYzT8HEZ9LziQhP6JfNfd4co9A7muUYQhPMJsMUojSF, 102511, 20210217
QmRhYzT8HEZ9LziQhP6JfNfd4co9A7muUYQhPMJsMUojSF, 189511, 20210219
QmRhYzT8HEZ9LziQhP6JfNfd4co9A7muUYQhPMJsMUojSF, 180074, 20210220
QmRhYzT8HEZ9LziQhP6JfNfd4co9A7muUYQhPMJsMUojSF, 173312, 20210221
QmRhYzT8HEZ9LziQhP6JfNfd4co9A7muUYQhPMJsMUojSF, 148499, 20210222
QmRhYzT8HEZ9LziQhP6JfNfd4co9A7muUYQhPMJsMUojSF, 166510, 20210223
QmRhYzT8HEZ9LziQhP6JfNfd4co9A7muUYQhPMJsMUojSF, 172330, 20210224
QmRhYzT8HEZ9LziQhP6JfNfd4co9A7muUYQhPMJsMUojSF, 161198, 20210225
QmRhYzT8HEZ9LziQhP6JfNfd4co9A7muUYQhPMJsMUojSF, 152411, 20210226
QmRhYzT8HEZ9LziQhP6JfNfd4co9A7muUYQhPMJsMUojSF, 140392, 20210227
QmRhYzT8HEZ9LziQhP6JfNfd4co9A7muUYQhPMJsMUojSF, 138167, 20210228
QmRhYzT8HEZ9LziQhP6JfNfd4co9A7muUYQhPMJsMUojSF, 134491, 20210301
QmRhYzT8HEZ9LziQhP6JfNfd4co9A7muUYQhPMJsMUojSF, 113156, 20210302
QmRhYzT8HEZ9LziQhP6JfNfd4co9A7muUYQhPMJsMUojSF, 129508, 20210303
QmRhYzT8HEZ9LziQhP6JfNfd4co9A7muUYQhPMJsMUojSF, 122893, 20210304
QmRhYzT8HEZ9LziQhP6JfNfd4co9A7muUYQhPMJsMUojSF, 25581, 20210305
QmRhYzT8HEZ9LziQhP6JfNfd4co9A7muUYQhPMJsMUojSF, 190944, 20210306
QmRhYzT8HEZ9LziQhP6JfNfd4co9A7muUYQhPMJsMUojSF, 151229, 20210307
QmRhYzT8HEZ9LziQhP6JfNfd4co9A7muUYQhPMJsMUojSF, 117728, 20210308
QmRhYzT8HEZ9LziQhP6JfNfd4co9A7muUYQhPMJsMUojSF, 54805, 20210309
QmRhYzT8HEZ9LziQhP6JfNfd4co9A7muUYQhPMJsMUojSF, 126816, 20210310
QmRhYzT8HEZ9LziQhP6JfNfd4co9A7muUYQhPMJsMUojSF, 169748, 20210311
QmRhYzT8HEZ9LziQhP6JfNfd4co9A7muUYQhPMJsMUojSF, 161799, 20210312
QmRhYzT8HEZ9LziQhP6JfNfd4co9A7muUYQhPMJsMUojSF, 166621, 20210313
QmRhYzT8HEZ9LziQhP6JfNfd4co9A7muUYQhPMJsMUojSF, 163947, 20210314
QmRhYzT8HEZ9LziQhP6JfNfd4co9A7muUYQhPMJsMUojSF, 74610, 20210315
QmRhYzT8HEZ9LziQhP6JfNfd4co9A7muUYQhPMJsMUojSF, 7516, 20210316
QmRhYzT8HEZ9LziQhP6JfNfd4co9A7muUYQhPMJsMUojSF, 106211, 20210317
QmRhYzT8HEZ9LziQhP6JfNfd4co9A7muUYQhPMJsMUojSF, 138919, 20210318

Could you, please, help to figure out this issue.

Regards,

Start with the GraphQL indexer query for totalAllocations and compare the allocation from epoch 65 to 91 with the supplied server-log query totals. Trace how queryFeesCollected is populated for closed allocations; done means explaining or correcting the discrepancy against the expected total of 194.07185.